Comparison

mxu.io vs AgentMail: platform or utility?

Both give AI agents email. The honest difference: AgentMail is a platform — semantic search across inboxes, prompt-based auto-labeling, custom domains, enterprise features, backed by $6M in funding. mxu.io is a utility — the shortest path from "my agent needs an inbox" or "my test needs to read an OTP" to done, at a flat price. Plenty of teams should pick AgentMail. Here's how to tell which one you are.

Side by side

mxu.ioAgentMail
PositioningLightweight utility for agents & test suitesFull email platform for agent products
Pricing modelFlat: $0 / $9 / $29 / $99 per monthFree tier (3 inboxes), then $20/mo Developer, $200/mo Startup
InterfaceMCP-first remote server + plain REST (curl works day one)API + SDKs (Python, TypeScript), webhooks
OTP / link handlingDeterministic extraction on every message (extracted.otp, extracted.verify_link) — exact, instant, no AI costAI features: semantic search, auto-labeling
Blocking receivewait_for_message long-poll built for agent loops and CIWebhook/event driven
RetentionEphemeral by design: 48h free, 30–365 days paidStorage-oriented (GB quotas)
Custom domainsNot yetYes
Semantic searchNo — your agent already has a brainYes
Best forCI email assertions, agent tutorials/demos, OTP flows, hobby & indie agentsProduction agent products with heavy email workloads and teams

Choose AgentMail if…

Choose mxu.io if…

The philosophical difference

AgentMail adds intelligence to the inbox. We think the intelligence is already on your side of the API — what agents and tests actually lack is structure and timing. So mxu invests in deterministic extraction and blocking primitives instead of AI features, keeps retention short by default (which also protects the shared domain from abuse), and keeps sending behind strict guardrails so deliverability stays clean for everyone.

Try mxu free